asiansiren:

Another point of observation, both among my predominantly white vanilla circle and purely among the politics regarding our profession, is that upper-class, civilian white women are among the most vocal who attack our trade – they are the ones who speak out on new regulation, who fund political organizations, who pushed for the formation of SESTA/FOSTA in the first place, and ultimately, proclaim a false sense of authority over the issue – when they, in fact, have none.

What I noticed is that they never do so out of a holistic basis of understanding or out of genuine empathy: they do this because they feel threatened. They do so out of base instinct, the perception that there is additional competition for limited resources. Above all else, they do this out of self-interest.

There are a number of reasons why there is resentment against us, but aside from male entitlement it comes down to:

  • The perception that sex work is “easy”, as a form of unskilled, manual labor that does not require a formal education – and hence with the revenue it can produce, is a means of “cheating the system”. People do not perceive it as fair, and because they formulate their opinions on the basis of comparison, they opt to attack it because they perceive it as a loss of comparative resources. Rather than both profiting, people feel a sense of satisfaction from someone being beneath them, and because attacking this profession is an uncontroversial opinion, they do so.
  • Acquisition of social status, in which women elevate their perceived value by degrading the value of another women – and hence, by attacking women in this industry on the false perception of morality, they hope to appeal to others. They do this in a multitude of ways, largely by proclaiming that they are more virtuous, that they would never do such inherently dirty labor, that placing such expectations is inherently wrong – all other methods of what we might call, being a “pick-me”.
  • Appealing to outdated stereotypes, such as proclaiming that the women in this industry are uneducated, helpless, or unintelligent, which attempts to evoke pity, but is really an attempt to strip us of our agency on the basis of misunderstanding.

Wealthy white women especially, are the most threatened, because in this realm, neither their whiteness, their virtuous femininity, nor their wealth, are valued here. White women dictate the social norms for female beauty, but in this industry, women of color can be just as successful, if not more successful, than white women. Remember, white men have never had any qualms about engaging with women of color, they’ve simply had issues marrying them – except now, in this world, we can benefit from their engagement, instead of holding it solely as a burden. They also perceive it as competition from men that they feel entitled to – wealthy, successful white men. When they compete with women like us, who place a ruthless focus on self-improvement, beauty, and sexuality, they know that they will likely be outdone. Since they cannot compete with us on the basis of appeal, they do so by attempting to proclaim morality, when in reality, it is a desperate attempt to continue to reap the benefits that their whiteness and their socioeconomic class have given them.

puddingskinmcgee:

nobody wants to admit it but lgbt representation in almost all media is in a really bad place right now

everybody wants to pretend we’re in a renaissance when in reality we’re in a dark age, where bury your gays, stereotyping, baiting, and “implying” is at an all time high in popular media. The truth is that people have realized because of the abyssmally low bar that LGBT people have for representation in media, most of us will lap up any scraps they give us. LGBT representation isn’t a statement any more, it’s a clever ploy to get the support of a community while giving them so little that they don’t alienate bigots in the process, and the bar needs to be set higher or else we’ll only see this cycle continue

(via space-age-babe)

Trump threatens years-long shutdown, national emergency if he doesn’t get wall funding

news.vice.com

Trump threatens years-long shutdown, national emergency if he doesn’t get wall funding

But he's still saying Mexico will pay for it.

okayysophia:

afronerdism:

yumearashi:

kedreeva:

jenniferrpovey:

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

ayellowbirds:

tharook:

wodneswynn:

fromacomrade:

President Donald Trump once again unleashed what’s become his presidential hallmark: a bizarre, winding, threatening press conference, this time following his White House meeting with Democratic leaders Friday to try to break the impasse causing the government shutdown.

In a long, meandering briefing in the Rose Garden, Trump told reporters the partial shutdown now heading into its third week could go on for months, even years, if Democrats don’t give him the $5.6 billion he’s demanding to build a U.S.-Mexico border wall. The Democrats have steadfastly refused. The shutdown has affected some 800,000 federal workers — 420,000 of them forced to work without pay — since Dec. 22.

“This is national security we’re talking about,” Trump said. “We’re not talking about games.“

When asked if there was any “safety net” for workers going without pay as the shutdown continues, Trump responded: “The safety net is going to be having a strong border.”

Trump also floated another way he could get his wall: declaring a state of national emergency over border security to build it without congressional approval.

“I could do it if I wanted,” Trump said.

If y’all are curious as to why I get so militant about the politics well it may or may not have something to do with the fact that the president of America is a wild man who believes things he himself made up and who talks about dissolving his own government and installing himself as a dictator as if it ain’t no big deal.

“I could do it if I wanted” indeed.  Those words probably gonna haunt my dreams tonight ngl

The safety net for furloughed employees is a strong border? Is Mexico going to pay their wages like they’re going to pay for the wall?

Those employees include hospital staff, emergency services, and other staff of critical support structures. This is going to kill people, if it hasn’t already.

Impeach the bastard.

LOCK HIM UP

TSA screeners are working without pay and some are not doing their jobs properly. A growing number are involved in an informal sick out, causing longer lines.

We already have a shortage of air traffic controllers. One in five are eligible for retirement. If a significant number of them choose to retire rather than stick out the shutdown, we will have a long term problem, especially as the new apprentices in training are also likely to quit.

They have also furloughed all aviation safety inspectors, although they’re being called in without pay as needed.

Tl;dr - if you don’t have to fly right now, don’t.

Other effects: Affordable housing contracts are not being renewed. Nobody has been turned out onto the streets yet, but landlords are cutting back on maintenance.

If the shutdown passes January 20, while food stamp recipients will get money for February (early), they may not get it for March.

FEMA will not have funding after January 31. Some people are still waiting for roof repairs they now won’t get.

The Coast Guard has almost no money left, which, oh! That affects border security. Hey, drug smugglers? All ya need to do is get in a boat. It will also affect safety.

Tl;dr - yes, people are going to die, and we may have a major air disaster. Or another terrorist attack. And more drugs getting into the country.

Yet, 75% of Republicans still support the wall…over American lives.

FDA is stopping inspections on a lot of food types, when we’re already having people sick and dying over lettuce. The FDA workers that are still working are doing so without pay.

Manufacture crisis > declare emergency > seize power = dictatorship

Mark my words. I would not be surprised if during the 2020 election we experience a “terrorist attack” to rival 9/11 wherein Trump declares the state of our nation is too volitile to have our leadership changing hands and move to “postpone” the election.

^^^^ I’ve been thinking the same thing ever since he was sworn to office. Everyone been talking about 2020 elections since 2016 and seeing how petty this deformed carrot is I wouldn’t be surprised….

183 House Republicans just voted against resuming food safety inspection

thinkprogress.org

183 House Republicans just voted against resuming food safety inspection

H.R. 265 would have provided funding for agriculture, rural development, food stamps, and the Food and Drug Administration.

saywhat-politics:

President Donald Trump’s shutdown is days from breaking the record for the longest in U.S. history, and its harmful impacts are already being felt by millions of Americans. One of the consequences of the partial shutdown is that the Food and Drug Administration has stopped doing most of its food safety inspections — just weeks after a major E. coli outbreak hit the nation’s romaine lettuce supply.

To address this crisis, the House of Representatives passed a bill on Thursday that would reopen the small portions of the government that are responsible for agriculture, food safety, and rural development. The legislation, H.R. 265, was approved by a 243 to 183 vote. But just 10 Republicans joined the Democratic majority in support of the bill, while the remaining 183 Republicans voted against it.

🙄🙄🙄🙄

jeffbezosdivorcelawyer:

liberals and conservatives put in zero effort to understand that when we talk about eliminating hunger and poverty, we’re not fucking saying “any progress made is bad”.

we’re saying there is an unecessary hesitance to solve the issue and leaving it to the market, which, after capitalism’s entire existence of The Market Helping, billions of people live in poverty.

when I address this issue 90% of the responses I get are “look at this graph, it was worse in 1980” or whatever. there’s just repetitive feel-good political talking points. it sucks.


Indy Theme by Safe As Milk